Evaluating the Syntax-Somatic Model’s Impact on Grammatical Accuracy among Learners of English as a Second Language (ESL)

Authors

  • Philip Abayomi Olorunfemi
    Department of Curriculum Studies and Educational Technology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria
  • Saleh Mohammed
    Department of Curriculum Studies and Educational Technology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria

Keywords:

Syntax-Somatic Model, Grammatical accuracy, Adult ESL learners, Somatic learning, Embodied cognition

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of the Syntax-Somatic Model (SSM) on grammatical accuracy among learners of English as a Second Language (ESL). It was motivated by the limitations of conventional grammar teaching methods, which often emphasize memorization and repetitive drills without sufficient learner participation or communicative engagement. The SSM, developed by the researchers, integrates syntax instruction with somatic learning activities, including gesture-supported learning, dramatization, role-play, movement-oriented grammar practice, collaborative interaction, and contextual communication. The study adopted a quasi-experimental pretest--posttest non-equivalent control group design. The population comprised adult ESL learners in selected continuing education centers in Lagos, Nigeria, and the sample consisted of 120 participants selected through purposive and simple random sampling techniques. Data were collected with the researchers' Grammatical Accuracy Achievement Test (GAAT), which was validated by experts and yielded a Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of 0.82. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, t-test, and ANCOVA at the 0.05 level of significance. Findings showed that the SSM significantly improved grammatical accuracy, retention, learner participation, and communicative confidence. The study concluded that SSM is an innovative and effective framework for adult ESL grammar instruction.

Dimensions

Celce-Murcia, M., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Williams, H. A. (2014). The grammar book: Form, meaning, and use for English language teachers (3rd ed.). Heinle ELT.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215--217.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. Edward Arnold.

Hu, C., Chen, S., & Liu, Y. (2025). The embodied simulation of L2 grammatical aspect: Proficiency-dependent evidence from the action-sentence compatibility effect. Behavioral Sciences, 15(11), 1581.

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269--293). Penguin Books.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Jusslin, S., Korpinen, K., Lilja, N., Martin, R., Lehtinen-Schnabel, J., & Anttila, E. (2022). Embodied learning and teaching approaches in language education: A mixed studies review. Educational Research Review, 37, 100480.

Knowles, M. S. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Gulf Publishing.

Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lamimi, I. J. (2025). Embodied pedagogy in the EFL classroom: The impact of gesture use on grammar learning and metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 3(3), 1--11. https://doi.org/10.61424/ijah.v3i3.586

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). Grossman Publishers.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sang, Z., & Zou, W. (2022). The effect of joint production on the accuracy and complexity of second language writing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(2), 425--443.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53--55.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625--636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322.

Xu, J., & Li, C. (2022). Timing of form-focused instruction: Effects on EFL learners' grammar learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 405--433. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.3.4.

fig2

Published

2026-07-09

How to Cite

Evaluating the Syntax-Somatic Model’s Impact on Grammatical Accuracy among Learners of English as a Second Language (ESL). (2026). Journal of Arts, Meaning and Public Life, 1(1), 380. https://rans.nsps.org.ng/index.php/jampl/article/view/380

Issue

Section

Arts Section

How to Cite

Evaluating the Syntax-Somatic Model’s Impact on Grammatical Accuracy among Learners of English as a Second Language (ESL). (2026). Journal of Arts, Meaning and Public Life, 1(1), 380. https://rans.nsps.org.ng/index.php/jampl/article/view/380

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)